Psychic Readings?

from

So we have reached this point. Reluctantly. After four years investigating my medical dowsing experience together with the skeptical community, it is now time to pack up my things and head over to continue in the paranormal field. Results from my individual readings with skeptics, the study, and tests with the skeptics, have overall provided results that are somewhere in the middle. Not 100%, but also not 0%. My medical dowsing seems to be better than statistical random chance would like it to be. I am not convinced that I can not do medical dowsing. Yet I have not concluded that I can either. But I know that I have to investigate more.

The skeptical community seems content that any results below 100% is 0% and instant falsification and case closed and I am having a hard time finding skeptical persons to sit for a reading so that I could add more data into the results. So I am taking the plunge into the woo field to see if it is more open to consideration of possible unexplainable experiences.

Why reluctantly?

Claims of the paranormal typically involve subjective experiences. Many practitioners of the paranormal are personally convinced that their experiences are real representations of reality as opposed to being arbitrary and subjective.

www.whatstheharm.net such as this one, "[A judge] claimed that three invisible mystic elves helped him render decisions and heal people in his chambers. The Supreme Court ruled that psychic powers have no place in the court room and fired him from his job."source